Mark D. Roberts does the honors, giving a concise summary of the “new perspective on Paul,” identifying the stakes involved, and pleading for Christians everywhere to go back to the Bible, even if it doesn’t say what we have thought it says. He is right about Wright, even if Wright is wrong, and he even goes the extra mile by linking to a bounty of other worthwhile reading.
Recent Comments
- Stones Cry Out - If they keep silent… » Things Heard: e221v1 on Did Paul Believe in a Historical Adam?
- Monday Highlights | Pseudo-Polymath on Did Paul Believe in a Historical Adam?
- Khirbet Qeiyafa’s Model Shrines and the Accuracy of the Bible on Qeiyafa Evidence of an Early Judahite Cultus
- Darrell Pursiful on On Strange Liturgical Bedfellows
- jonathan robinson on On Strange Liturgical Bedfellows
Categories
Darrell's Links
Big Ideas
Heart
Mind
Soul
Strength
Archives


Pingback: Pseudo-Polymath » Blog Archive » Thursday Highlights