In honor of Blogger Appreciation Day, here are some of the most interesting things I’ve read since this morning:
Wright and right on shifting the balance of power in the Anglican Communion by Peter Kirk. I’m not an Anglican; I don’t even play one on TV. Peter’s posts on the subject help me understand a bit more of what my Anglican brothers and sisters are going through. They are measured, charitable, and thought-provoking. This post is no exception.
The itch that inerrancy scratches by Richard A. Rhodes. I may or may not be an inerrantist, depending on your definition. Quite a few bibliobloggers have been weighing in on the subject of biblical inerrancy in recent weeks. This post challenges believers to set a higher bar when it comes to the truth claims of Scripture, even if it means rejecting simplistic understandings of inerrancy.
A brief note on inerrancy by Chris Heard. Following with the inerrancy theme, Chris notes why, from the point of view of sola scriptura (at least in certain interpretations thereof) the language of inerrancy is — or should be — problematic for a certain kind of free-church Protestant.
I’m appreciative of all the blogs listed in my blogroll. They all make me think or they wouldn’t be listed there. These three were the cream of today’s crop, at least in my estimation. Keep up the good work, guys, and may your hard drives never crash!
As usual, I’m a day late and a dollar short: You informed us that “Blogger Appreciation Day” was yesterday. My intention was to comment at each blog on my Bloglines subscription, but you know where the road paved with good intentions leads…
So here’s a note to let you know that I appreciate you and your writing, Dr. P. Thanks for blogging.