Comments on: Repost: The Nimrod Myth http://pursiful.com/2010/07/repost-the-nimrod-myth/ Darrell Pursiful's blog Mon, 14 May 2012 13:24:52 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Darrell Pursiful http://pursiful.com/2010/07/repost-the-nimrod-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-1917 Darrell Pursiful Mon, 05 Jul 2010 19:30:57 +0000 http://pursiful.com/?p=2784#comment-1917 Thanks, Michael. You'll get no argument from me on the "global-versus-local" issue. In fact, I've blogged about how Sumerian documents shed light on a possible dating for the (local) Genesis Flood <a href="http://pursiful.com/2008/01/can-the-sumerians-help-date-the-genesis-flood/" rel="nofollow">in a previous blog post</a>. Thanks, Michael. You’ll get no argument from me on the “global-versus-local” issue. In fact, I’ve blogged about how Sumerian documents shed light on a possible dating for the (local) Genesis Flood in a previous blog post.

]]> By: Michael Westmoreland-White http://pursiful.com/2010/07/repost-the-nimrod-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-1910 Michael Westmoreland-White Sat, 03 Jul 2010 11:31:24 +0000 http://pursiful.com/?p=2784#comment-1910 Interesting. I usually learn something when I visit. If the Genesis flood has a historical basis, it must be "local"--i.e., the "world" flooded has to be the world known in ancient Mesopotamia. Because, young earthers to the contrary, there is no geologic evidence for a truly global flood--and much counter-evidence. Interesting. I usually learn something when I visit.

If the Genesis flood has a historical basis, it must be “local”–i.e., the “world” flooded has to be the world known in ancient Mesopotamia. Because, young earthers to the contrary, there is no geologic evidence for a truly global flood–and much counter-evidence.

]]>