Recent Comments
- Stones Cry Out - If they keep silent… » Things Heard: e221v1 on Did Paul Believe in a Historical Adam?
- Monday Highlights | Pseudo-Polymath on Did Paul Believe in a Historical Adam?
- Khirbet Qeiyafa’s Model Shrines and the Accuracy of the Bible on Qeiyafa Evidence of an Early Judahite Cultus
- Darrell Pursiful on On Strange Liturgical Bedfellows
- jonathan robinson on On Strange Liturgical Bedfellows
Categories
Darrell's Links
Big Ideas
Heart
Mind
Soul
Strength
Archives
Tag Archives: Romans
Adam: Genesis and Paul
There has been a lot of blog chatter lately about the “historical Adam” and whether or not he actually existed. I suspect the real issue for some Christians is not so much what to do with the Adam we find … Continue reading
Earliest Manuscript of Romans?
John Byron reports on a newly discovered fragment of Romans (chs. 9–10, to be precise), which has only come to light in the last 48 hours. CNN is reporting that a recently unknown fragment of Romans 9-10 has been discovered in the … Continue reading
The Ephesians Road
I think it was Scot McKnight who suggested that the “New Perspective on Paul” would make a lot more sense to traditional Protestants if they assumed that Ephesians was the epitome of Pauline theology rather than Romans or Galatians. (He … Continue reading
Phoebe in English Translations and Philological Realities
In the latest SBL Forum, Elizabeth A. McCabe calls attention to the deficiencies of English Bible translations in terms of Phoebe’s description in Romans 16:1-2 as a διακονός and a προστατίς. Regarding διακονός (diakonos), commonly translated as “minister” or “deacon” … Continue reading

