In Search of a Baseline
In the next few weeks I’ll blog from time to time on the issue of how Christians worshiped in the years leading up to the “conversion” of emperor Constantine in the year 312 and the Council of Nicea in 325. This was a benchmark era of church history that marked the transition of Christianity from a persecuted religion to one first tolerated and ultimately endorsed by the greatest political power then in existence. My free-church heritage has taught me to be highly suspicious of the “Constantinianization” of the church and its repercussions up to the present day. Whether my heritage has overplayed the evidence for a widespread apostasy during the fourth century is beyond the scope of this study. In deference to free-church sensitivities on this matter, however, I have chosen to concentrate on the pre-Constantinian era.
I know of no other place where what is most surely known about how Christians worshiped in the 2nd-4th centuries is gathered in one place in (what I hope is) a user-friendly presentation. My goal is to describe this form of worship in such a way that even someone who has never experienced liturgical worship can at least imagine what it would have been like in these early communities.
At the same time, I would like to open up a discussion about the “baseline” from which we work on the renewal of worship in the 21st century. This series will by no means be a “how-to” manual for worship, as if we could bypass all of the history that takes us from 325 to the current day. I do hope to generate a deeper appreciation for the ancient forms that, hopefully, at least a few in the free-church tradition will be inspired to adapt to their own settings.
Free Churches, Catholic Worship
Do free churches have anything to learn from this kind of worship? Personally, I believe we should be able to run with it! First, ancient worship developed in an era of local church autonomy, where pastors (bishops) in collegial relationships with one another strove to uphold church unity not by force of hierarchical decrees but by a common commitment to the unity of the church. They thus developed ways to keep their worship sufficiently familiar across geographical lines while still honoring local customs, and occasionally agreeing to disagree about the particulars.
Second, ancient worship extends freedom to church leaders to compose their own prayers, either in the study or “on the spot.” The ancient tradition provides numerous texts and examples, but never does it impose one canonical form of prayer. For example, in the fourth century the church in Alexandria employed an early form of the Liturgy of Saint Mark, while their neighbors 100 miles away in Thmuis used the prayers contained in the Euchologion of their bishop, Sarapion. Both liturgies have certain general features that liturgiologists classify as “Egyptian,” but relatively few verbal similarities.
All of the early evidence is unanimous that worship leaders composed their own prayers. To be sure, they did this building upon the customs they learned from their predecessors, and the church in this era was generally averse to radical innovation in liturgical forms. Even so, a mere hundred miles away from one of the most prominent churches in the world, Thmuite Christians apparently felt complete freedom to worship according to their own local customs.
A third factor in favor of ancient worship is that it involves a minimum of ceremonial. This was an era before incense, icons, vestments, prayer books or processionals. In fact, most of the beliefs and practices that inspire the Free Church’s “Romophobia” developed after Constantine—and often the church in Rome was one of the last holdouts to embracing these traditions!
In all fairness, however, it must be noted that very early on there arose certain worship customs that are not directly attested in the New Testament and would probably seem foreign to the average free-church Christian. Tertullian mentioned some of these in On the Chaplet 3. He noted, for example, customs surrounding baptism:
To deal with this matter briefly, I shall begin with baptism. When we are going to enter the water, but a little before, in the presence of the congregation and under the hand of the president, we solemnly profess that we disown the devil, and his pomp, and his angels. Hereupon we are thrice immersed, making a somewhat ampler pledge than the Lord has appointed in the Gospel. Then when we are taken up (as new-born children), we taste first of all a mixture of milk and honey, and from that day we refrain from the daily bath for a whole week.
Tertullian also described the customary time and manner of Eucharistic worship:
We take also, in congregations before daybreak, and from the hand of none but the presidents, the sacrament of the Eucharist, which the Lord both commanded to be eaten at meal-times, and enjoined to be taken by all alike.
He went on to discuss additional customs including the commemorations of martyrs, a rudimentary liturgical calendar, and making the sign of the cross:
As often as the anniversary comes round, we make offerings for the dead as birthday honors. We count fasting or kneeling in worship on the Lord’s day to be unlawful. We rejoice in the same privilege also from Easter to Pentecost. We feel pained should any wine or bread, even though our own, be cast upon the ground. At every forward step and movement, at every going in and out, when we put on our clothes and shoes, when we bathe, when we sit at table, when we light the lamps, on couch, on seat, in all the ordinary actions of daily life, we trace upon the forehead the sign.
Similar examples may be found in the writings of Origen (Homily on Numbers 5:1) and Basil of Caesarea (On the Holy Spirit 27:66-67). But despite these customs, on the whole, pre-Constantinian Christians practiced their liturgy in an informal manner that may well have put a time-traveling Nazarene or Baptist at ease.
Fourth, we are dealing with a time before creeds were recited as a part of weekly worship. For fellowships that insist upon “no creed but the Bible,” this has to be a plus. Before Nicea, and indeed for 150 years afterward, the churches used their various creeds to instruct new converts before their baptism. They looked upon these various statements as accurate summaries of what Scripture taught and not as having authority apart from the Scripture to which they bore witness. Baptists in particular should have no problems with looking upon the ancient creeds in this light, as it is essentially what they have always said about their own doctrinal confessions. This understanding of the proper use of creedal statements is also not far from the teaching of Alexander Campbell and the early Restorationist movement.
Finally, pre-Constantinian worship gives us a basic structure and discipline to worship without stuffy formality or Spirit-quenching regimentation. The evidence leans toward a worship experience marked as much by warmth and informality as by ceremonial. The two were, in fact, balanced against each other as they still are in Jewish worship today. Ancient worship at its best was not a sterile “program” but something living and dynamic. It could be this way not in spite of its structure, but because of it.
Next: Keva and Kavvanah
Long-time readers will recognize this series as a reprint from my old blog, somewhat edited and updated. I first ran this material over a year ago, but I’m itching to either take Disert Paths down or do something different with it, so I’ll be moving some oldies but goodies over here in the next few months.
Cheers, man, well said.
Thanks, Kyle. As you may discern, this is something of a soapbox for me. We ought to think about why we do what we do when we worship.
Fascinating…and why is it so difficult for us, I wonder? Your last paragraph got me to thinking about a synagogue service I attended some time back at the request of my Jewish employer. It is true…they combined a certain pattern of worship with moments of humor and spontanaity. I hadn’t quite thought of it in that way before. I have to think some more about how to do this. It seems we tend to swing too far one way or the other, but if our Jewish friends can manage it, so can we. 🙂
Five-Step Small Group Worship
By Steve Baney
When we gather for congregational worship, we usually spend most of our time staring at the backs of the heads of the people sitting in front of us. Singing this way feels safer, because it seems like no one is looking at us while we sing. But in a small group, we often face each other. Something changes when we’re invited to worship in a small group setting. Suddenly our safe, intimate time with our God becomes a spotlight on our off-key, sour-pitch performance.
When the environment of worship changes, our style of worship should change with it. Here’s my five-step reflection on leading small group worship in a way that minimizes the awkward “Don’t look at me” syndrome.
Choose to either (a) sing something familiar, or (b) provide lyrics of something familiar. Notice, in both instances, the songs selected are familiar to the group. Learning new music is awkward. And that queezy feeling multiplies when we’re in a small group setting. If I introduce new music to a small group, I try to keep it simple, make it short, and if at all possible, sing with an echo (I sing a line, then you repeat).
Read the next four steps on the TIPS page at http://www.ShapingWorship.com
+Please forgive me,I stumbled on your site researching Science discoveries. I am an Orthodox Christian and I must say there is so much you are discussing that is out of context. What we do as Orthodox is done out of love for our God, his son, and the holy spirit. Love is the key to all that we do. We Worship our God on a Sunday and not study him. The consecration of the Eucharist is a mystery that occurs when “heaven and earth are in union”. The kneeling, fasting, incense, recitation of the creed, singing, chanting, icons, praying, robes, churchs and language are a part of our practice and discipline.We do these things to engage all of our senses. Our sense of smell, sight, song, prayer,touch, taste, sound, intellect are all engaged for one purpose-the Glorification of God and His Holy Son. We ask for mercy and pray that we may stay focused and Holy enough that the Holy Spirit not only visits, but abides in us always. Our goal is Holiness and oneness with our Lord and Savior. To be the shining light of love and reflect all that Jesus asks us to do by working through us. The study of the saints and thier lives is a great blueprint of what is expected of us-how do we attain that? The Orthodox have been at this even before Constantine-the monastic records have examples of this. Please keep in mind all of this is done to Worship and Glorify our God, Lord and Savior. We live our lives not just in our church or community, but we start in our homes where we have alters placed in special areas and we pray on the “hours”. We take our message of love to our family and children,friends, neighbors, teachers, doctors, lawmakers,any one we encounter. A true practicing Orthodox Christian will be recognized first by thier love, and then by thier piety and commitment to exercise thier faith. These things mentioned earlier that seem like insignificant entrapments to those who have never really experienced this life are liberating to an Orthodox Christian. Having a path to follow and practice, places focus and discipline in our lives. Our flesh is weak, engaging it in Holy practice may not be a bad thing. I welcome everyone to learn more about this misunderstood faith and practice. If it is your path to participate than you will be welcome, if not than you will be welcomed as well. It is the Holy Spirit that works within us-not anything else. We are not here to criticize or proselytize but to love and share the message of Christ our Lord and his saving grace.
When I was teaching the young children in our Church School(Sunday School), they would always ask me why there are so many religions. I said to them, first God makes no mistakes only man, but he always turns things around to the benefit of His Holy purpose. I then would equate Christians to Olympians. I would explain to them that some of the runners would train in Russia, Africa, Middle East, Europe, and of course the USA. Each team has thier own methods,practices,training, and even traditions they feel will get them to the finish line. Some will make it faster than others, some will stumble and try again another day and there are those who never try. It is the ones who are not trying that we need to encourage and build up. We all will make it just in different ways as God created us a unique individuals so will our paths be. May God Bless all those who read this and may the love and light of our Holy Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ consume your mind, body, and soul.
Please reference an award winning website: goarch.org if you are interested in more information.+
Diana, What precisely am I discussing out of context? And where precisely have I said anything in the least bit disparaging of Orthodox Christianity—a tradition for which I have a great deal of respect, even though it is not one I wholeheartedly embrace?
Thank you for the good work.
Please, we need the old truth just as the apostles laid the foundation so do not make any change that may remove the real truth leading us to do something else in the name of Christ. Keep the truth, the word of God remain forever.