David Heddle explains it. Scofield also found feminine imagery for God in Genesis 17:1. Fortunately, the Revised Scofield Reference Bible corrected this obvious mistake. 😉
Home » Tomfoolery » Christendumb » I’m Tempted to Call It “The Scofield Paradox”
I’m Tempted to Call It “The Scofield Paradox”
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Blogroll
Categories
- +Apostles' Teaching
- +Fellowship
- +The Breaking of Bread
- +The Prayers
- Advent
- All Saints
- Bible
- Christendumb
- Christmas
- Church Music
- Easter
- Epiphany
- Ethics
- Holy Week
- Lent
- Life as Prayer
- Mere Catholicity
- Ministry
- New Testament
- Old Testament
- Praying Together
- Private Devotion
- Theology
- Tomfoolery
- Uncategorized
- Wealth of Egypt
- Who? Me?
1 Comment
Comments are closed.
Tags
1 Chronicles
1 Clement
1 Corinthians
1 John
1 Kings
1 Peter
1 Samuel
2 Baruch
2 Chronicles
2 Enoch
2 John
2 Kings
2 Peter
2 Samuel
3 Enoch
3 John
4 Ezra
Acts
Apostolic Tradition
Athanasius
Augustine
Christology
Cyprian
Deuteronomy
Didache
E. P. Sanders
Ephesians
Esther
Evangelicalism
Exodus
Flood
Galatians
Genesis
Gospel
Gospel of Thomas
Gospels
Greek
Gregory of Nyssa
Hebrews
Hillel
Historical Jesus
Irenaeus
Isaiah
James
Jeremiah
Jerome
Jesus
John
John Chrysostom
Joshua
Judaica
Judaism
Judges
Justin Martyr
Leviticus
Luke
Mark
Martin Hengel
Matthew
Mishnah
Noah
Numbers
Passover
Pastoral Epistles
Patristics
Paul
Peter Enns
Psalms
Rabbinics
Revelation
Romans
Shammai
Talmud
Tertullian
Thanksgiving
Darrell,
Thank you for this information. I will post this information on my blog.
Claude Mariottini
LikeLike